11/26/2022 0 Comments Ubiquiti vs mikrotikUBNT has terrible shielding so self interference reduces the number or channels you can use because they all need more space apart than should be needed. What this means is if you have 1 customer with a bad signal it degrades everybody on the sector, even the people with great signals. UBNT does a terrible job of creating data slots for each individual client. Over the course of a couple years we learned the following. Throughput was dropping dramatically for customers. Once we started hitting 15-20 customers per sector we started seeing big time problems. They were performing fine and working well. So UBNT, in the beginning they seemed great. We use Mikrotik quite a bit as well for backhauls and routers, but as access points to send internet to customers they are the least attractive as far as offerings. With lots of towers these savings add up. Because of this my company forced me to give Ubiquiti a try. About 4000 to equip a 360 degree radius on a tower with Cambium vs 1500 with Ubiquiti. Cambium is by far #1 but comes with the price tag to prove it. In the wireless ISP business the 3 dominant companies to purchase from are Cambium, Ubiquiti, and Mikrotik. It's not seamless but works, and it's not like I wander from room to room doing mission-critical things that can't have dropouts. So I downloaded an app that polls wi-fi strength and, if it drops below a threshold I specify and if there is something some number of dB better nearby, it reconnects to the better signal. I don't do voice calls over wi-fi or anything else that truly needs seamless roaming, I just want my darn phone to connect to the nearest AP. The big realization for me was that it's really a client problem. Better but still a dead spot in a critical area, the office tucked away in a corner of the house (ironically where the cable enters the house and modem and primary router reside - the router's wireless signal is only good for the office and the adjacent bathroom and bedroom). I bought a single Unifi AP with no dedicated controller or special router, just because they seem to be good antennas and POE makes placement easy. What I don't have in my (admittedly complex) current system that is offered by UniFi and the AP's is automatic wireless management with band steering and channel management.Īgain, I would like to hear about your experience with Ubiquiti (AP's, switches, or whatever you used) from your Enterprise perspective.Ĭlick to expand.I was in the same situation as you, in a 100 year old house with plaster and lot of metal in the walls. I am looking to reduce the complexity of my system, and while the Microtik AP you linked would reduce the need for my AP's in half due to their ability to have multiple SSID's like the UniFi AP's, I don't think they would be approved by the aesthetics committee. I am guessing those materials pose more wireless signal challenges than fiber ductboard and romex electrical with plastic outlet boxes. As we know, wireless can be challenging, and my home is outside Chicago, and was constructed with metal HVAC ducts and metal electrical conduit and boxes. My home is only 3,500 SF with the finished basement, but I mapped my Wi-Fi signals using Wi-Fi Analyzer on an Android device, and determined I needed that many given my somewhat limited placement options. Each network has its own subnet, thanks to the flexibility of my Ubiquitie EdgeRouter Lite (ERL-3). The AP's are all Asus RT-AC68P routers flashed with DD-WRT. I currently have six (6) AP's 3 for my secure, and three for my non-secure network. One that will cover the whole house with no dead zones or low speed zones, and one that handoffs between points seamlessly when I walk around.Ĭlick to expand.In thinking about this a little further, my opinion about Ubiquiti comes from my "consumer" experience versus your professional experience. I looked at the Google mesh router and it seemed incredibly bare-bones for configuration in comparison.Īll that said, I'm really looking for a good wifi network. Not that I necessarily need all that stuff, but it's nice to know it's there. The reason I'm leaning toward the Ubiquiti is it seems that the edge router is a full featured professional router with all the functionality you would ever need (full VPN server support for OpenVPN and PPTP, full DHCP support with additional DHCP variables and static reservations, fully featured firewall, etc. If it makes any difference, I've got Ethernet strung to the two locations I'd like APs installed. However, I've seen a lot of the mesh (or mesh-esque) systems out there and maybe those are a better solution? I'm looking for some feedback. I'm leaning toward the Ubiquiti system with two of these with one of these. So my single AP setup in my house is failing me enough (slow areas, dead zones) that I'm looking for solutions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |